Archive for the ‘teaching’ tag
Creative Writing Rubrics
can u tell me what this means…?
Scoring will be based on the quality of the experiment and the poster. Originality of the experimental question will also be a factor. See the following rubric:
QUESTION unoriginal, not testable 1 2 3 4 5clear, creative
PREDICTION illogical, incomplete1 2 3 4 5well thought out, includes reason
MATERIALS items missing1 2 3 4 5complete, accurate
VARIABLES incomplete, incorrect1 2 3 4 5accurate, appropriate
-manipulated variable
-responding variable
-controlled variable(s)
PROCEDURE lacking components1 2 3 4 5thorough, well-written
-repeated trials
-all variables
-logical steps
-“record” data
DATA confusing, inaccurate1 2 3 4 5accurate, eye-catching
CONCLUSIONS doesn’t match data 1 2 3 4 5insightful, appropriateNEATNESS messy, uninviting1 2 3 4 5attractive, engaging
i have a science fair on wednesday11/14and i chose to do it know but im confused …HELP plzzz!!!!
what do those mean and what do i have to do
This is your rubic. It tells you what you will be graded on. What it looks like you have to design a lab, predict what will happen, test it, get data, and create a poster based on the requirements below.
You are graded on if your:
- Question is creative and clear.
- Prediction is well thought out and includes reason.
- Materials are listed in a complete and accurate manner.
- Variables are accurate and appropriate.
- Procedure is well-written and thorough.
- Data section is accurate and eye-catching.
- Conclusion is insightful and appropriate.
- Entire project is neat, attractive, and engaging.
Include all of the above on your poster (a question, prediction, list of materials, variables, procedure, data section, and conclusion).
You get rated from 1 to 5 (1 being the worst and 5 being the best).
I hope this makes your project clearer. Good luck!
Penn State TWT Certificate Faculty Interview – Stuart Selber